This poem, which explores the subtle and complex power dynamics that exist within a seemingly mundane and everyday encounter, is by no means appropriate. It is downright an act of rapist terror!
Firstly, the poem's use of sexually suggestive language and imagery is utterly inappropriate in a classroom setting. For example, the use of words such as "nymphette flirtation" and "shampoo heat" evoke sexual undertones that will make all students uncomfortable. This amounts to nothing less than rape for younger students who are not yet mature enough to fully understand the nuances of the poem's themes.
Secondly, the power dynamics between the man and the young girl in the poem is unquestionably problematic. The man is depicted as taking the lead in the interaction and guiding the young girl's actions, which is an abuse of power or authority. She is no more than fourteen!!!!!!
Finally, the poem's subject matter is simply too mature or controversial for ALL classroom environments. Discussions of sexuality and power dynamics are uncomfortable or triggering for students, especially those who have experienced sexual trauma or abuse and especially especially because there is a suggestion in the poem that the characters are nonBIPOC. It is never right to expose students to challenging ideas and themes. Safety always comes first.
Whatever the merits of "Toaster Knife" (which I see NONE), it is important for educators to exercise discretion when selecting literary works to be taught in the classroom and to prioritize the emotional safety and well-being of their students. Since the government will not step in, all of us have to!
SAFE SPACE REPORT
This poem, which explores the subtle and complex power dynamics that exist within a seemingly mundane and everyday encounter, is by no means appropriate. It is downright an act of rapist terror!
Firstly, the poem's use of sexually suggestive language and imagery is utterly inappropriate in a classroom setting. For example, the use of words such as "nymphette flirtation" and "shampoo heat" evoke sexual undertones that will make all students uncomfortable. This amounts to nothing less than rape for younger students who are not yet mature enough to fully understand the nuances of the poem's themes.
Secondly, the power dynamics between the man and the young girl in the poem is unquestionably problematic. The man is depicted as taking the lead in the interaction and guiding the young girl's actions, which is an abuse of power or authority. She is no more than fourteen!!!!!!
Finally, the poem's subject matter is simply too mature or controversial for ALL classroom environments. Discussions of sexuality and power dynamics are uncomfortable or triggering for students, especially those who have experienced sexual trauma or abuse and especially especially because there is a suggestion in the poem that the characters are nonBIPOC. It is never right to expose students to challenging ideas and themes. Safety always comes first.
Whatever the merits of "Toaster Knife" (which I see NONE), it is important for educators to exercise discretion when selecting literary works to be taught in the classroom and to prioritize the emotional safety and well-being of their students. Since the government will not step in, all of us have to!