Discussion about this post

User's avatar
M. A. Istvan Jr.'s avatar

“Tribular” is a harsh, self-implicating meditation on class disgust, inherited proximity, and the uneasy boundary between observation and contempt. The poem operates as a portrait of a post-industrial underclass filtered through a speaker who is both of that world and estranged from it. Its power lies not merely in its graphic detail but in the tension between identification and revulsion. The poem does not offer a neutral ethnography; it stages the moral volatility of looking at poverty through the lens of escape.

The opening frames youth as propulsion—“Your rockets still thrust”—suggesting upward mobility fueled by distance from a city marked by vocational school dropouts and teen pregnancies. The phrase “your poor” signals both belonging and disavowal. The speaker claims them while simultaneously distinguishing himself as “university you.” The tension between insider and outsider is central: the poem scrutinizes a community shaped by infrastructural neglect (flammable tap water, kerosene heaters, mold buckets) and economic stagnation, yet the scrutiny is tinged with scorn. The flammable water detail evokes real municipal crises, transforming the landscape into one where environmental degradation is normalized into bragging rights. Survival becomes identity performance.

Throughout the poem, poverty is rendered in sensory overload: creaking shopping carts, sulfurous water, snake-like heaters, all-fat bacon, sagging single-wides. Food, water, and shelter are presented not merely as scarce but as degraded. The repetition of bodily imagery—fat, warts, illness, diarrhea—intensifies the sense of entrapment in corporeality. The community’s habits are depicted as both defensive pride and tragic adaptation: boasting about child support payments, literacy, or theft as markers of dignity in a system that has stripped them of conventional status. Even the staged struggle with pronunciation becomes a paradoxical assertion of agency. They insist on competence precisely where competence is doubted.

Yet the poem is not purely accusatory toward the poor. It also indicts the speaker’s own gaze. The line about “jaw clenched in repulsion” foregrounds self-awareness: the disgust is acknowledged rather than hidden. The mother’s gesture—passing along a comforter used in the unsanitary home without a second thought—collapses distance. The contamination is not just physical; it is genealogical. The speaker cannot fully separate from what he critiques. The blanket becomes a symbol of inescapable inheritance: class is not a costume one removes but a residue that travels through generations.

The title, “Tribular,” suggests both “tribal” and “tribulation.” The community is framed as post-industrial tribalism, bound by kinship networks that persist regardless of dysfunction. They “bring in friends and family members, though—no matter what,” revealing a rough loyalty absent from more atomized, upwardly mobile spaces. That hospitality coexists with decay. The poem refuses sentimental uplift. It dwells in contradiction: communal warmth amid filth, pride amid deprivation, dignity amid dysfunction.

What complicates the poem further is its proximity to ableist and derogatory language. The inclusion of such terms is not neutral; it intensifies the moral discomfort of the piece. Rather than endorsing dehumanization, the poem appears to dramatize how disgust and hierarchy are internalized within class mobility narratives. The speaker’s escape into higher education does not erase the psychic imprint of origin; instead, it sharpens his ambivalence. He is caught between empathy and contempt, between gratitude for survival and shame at association.

Ultimately, “Tribular” reads as a reckoning with class mobility’s cost. The upward trajectory requires not only labor but emotional severance. Yet the severance never fully succeeds. The “rockets” may thrust outward, but gravity remains. The blanket passed from mother to son becomes the final metaphor: material, intimate, impossible to disinfect entirely. The poem forces the reader to confront uncomfortable questions about how we narrate poverty, how disgust operates as a class marker, and how escape can morph into quiet betrayal.

class mobility, post-industrial poverty, generational inheritance, disgust and empathy, social stratification, environmental neglect, economic decline, family loyalty, internalized class shame, rural decay, post-industrial America, identity and escape, communal survival, poetic realism

No posts

Ready for more?