The Help (Round 3)
Let's workshop this poem about the superficiality and self-serving nature of performative allyship (as it shows itself in and around a watch party for the film The Help)
The Help Lip-injected ladies with yorkie haircuts cluster around the 4k genuflection in Lily’s living room, a hardcopy of White Fragility on the coffee table. Boho scarves, campus crusader cosplay, cover cleavages “raped daily by the white-male gaze.” Cheeks from the box rosé flushed the very shade their eat-pray-love type take on while “dancing” in makeshift runways of mimosa drag brunches (until sequined queens smack away their gropes and physically sit the messes back in their seats), they side glance (in the screen glow) the token each had managed to corner before the movie The Help began. A touch too impatient to reach green zones in the spectrum of white identities (white traitor or even abolitionist of whiteness), they had cornered their captive black to declare “Sorry, but white hair sucks”; and to confess how— “and no shade to the hubby” (wink)—they feel “so damn terrified around white men, especially with all the school shootings (clearly whitelash) and cops hunting down unarmed black kings (open season, like lynching 2.0)”; and to reveal “the fucking unbelievably racist BS whitespeak” some “colonizer coworker” voiced; and to flaunt iPhones of biracial goddaughters; and to malign Debbie, the watch-party no-show: “She’s the one who really needs this. She’s too fragile to see how Kia’s to blame for rises in Kia thefts—not blacks! I mean, if that’s not collusion I don’t know what is!” The ladies want to honor the “brave” actresses, later cooing: “Octavia’s so gorgeous! Her skin, it like literally glows. Look at mine! Like . . . so ugh!” And they want to honor equity and so “the voice here with us” who “deserves the chance to speak her truth first in a safe space as we shut up for once and stay in our lane.” So they hold a somber hush (aside from sniffles) well beyond the credit crawl until—after a heads-bowed interval insufferable, no doubt, for inebriated know-it-alls “dismayed” by “white supremacy’s knack for invisibility”— it is safe to conclude that their queen (“wordless,” they will later repeat over lunches, “due to pain, intergenerational traumas, palpable in her eyes”) tacitly sanctions their eagerness to hold court. Electrified by the guzzled wine, by the proximity to the precious, they abandon the usual vigilance muzzling the obnoxious register of their hunger for pardon. They unload their teary-boogery pity for “black folk wrecked by a triple-k Amerikkka” that “bullies beautiful black babies with algebra alien to black knowing”—“an antiblack nation whose supremacist stealth has kings and queens second-guessing how disenfranchised they are,” “leaving many (even many in college) needing still to learn,” if only from whiteness dismantlers like them (“To whom much [privilege] is given,” after all, “much is required”), “just how helpless oppression and victimization has made them.”
Convenient to deny how blacks are victims. THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE. Look at the shootings. Who do you serve? whO????