Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Safe Space Magazine's avatar

The story contains graphic depictions of sex and violence. Specifically, there are scenes depicting choking/strangulation during sex.

There are questionable power dynamics and consent issues in the sexual relationships described. For example, the affair with the girlfriend's sister while she is staying in their home.

The female characters are depicted in sexist or demeaning ways, playing into tropes about women's sexuality and intellectual capabilities.

The frequent references to drug and alcohol use is glorification or promotion of unhealthy/illegal behaviors.

The racial dynamic introduced in the lyrics referenced from "Josie" by Steely Dan is problematic.

There is a good list regardign why Substack needs to take this down (after, of course, it takes down the infant rape post by this "writer").

The scenes of choking/strangulation during sex will disturb some readers (especially BIPOC and LGBTQ reader who face the threat of violence EVERY SINGLE MOMENT OF THEIR LIVES). The line “even as far as that beat-red face whose choke petechiae—purple spots in the thousands, clustered around her cheeks and eyes” contains a visceral level of detail surrounding the violent act. Additionally, the affairs and sexual relationships described feature questionable power dynamics involving manipulation or inability to consent—for example, the narrator’s affair with his girlfriend’s troubled sister who is staying in their home.

Expand full comment
Safe Space Magazine's avatar

When working with provocative fictional narratives in an academic context, we must thoughtfully consider the implications and potential harm that graphic content can inflict. This short story contains imagery and themes that warrant condemnation. Specifically, the frequent depictions of nonconsensual sex, substance abuse, and violence against women create legitimate reasons for caution regarding how the text is framed and discussed.

The vivid language and layering of justifications for coercive sexual encounters raise flags. The female characters are objectified, choked without consent, or portrayed as complicit or even begging for abusive treatment. And the protagonist’s volatility having nearly driven him toward extreme violence is glossed over without facing consequences. Such tacit acceptance is sicko stuff!

Similarly, the recurring drug use furthers dangerous assumptions about the role of impaired consent and avoidance of accountability in sexual power dynamics. Caution demands analysis of the systemic impacts from any framing that erases victimization or dignity. Literature holds influence; we must question what messages steeping students in this content without a trauma-informed approach might reinforce.

Censorship almost always breeds understanding and growth so long as those being censored are the white males in power. Here the only rational solution is condemnation. Substack, please ban the work of yet another Nazi. Will you ever address your Nazi problem?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts