Beneath the Perfume If as a kid, for fun (but ultimately out of rage against what you did not fully understand to be a mirror), you night chucked beer bottles at whores (at least one of whom would a few years later, perhaps recognizing the boy beneath the dealer, blow you for crack); if as a kid you were foster-homed by CPS more than once due to “an unhealthy home” of wall-punch holes and dog-shit carpet, of plastic taped over sharded windowpanes; if as a kid you bathed from the coffee pot between bar-soap dips in the Texaco creek from which you bucketed water back home; if as a kid, among soda cans and scratch-offs, you all huddled around the oven for warmth while a father-figure accused you with hits, before puberty even, of trying to grope the tits and pussies of a mother or sister; if as a kid you dove fast-food dumpsters and got caught, by haunting parental eyes of pity-disgust, stealing tuna and sardines from classmate cupboards for nutrition beyond jelly trays and pork and beans and the just-add-water of powdered milk, of ramen and grits and potato flakes; if as a kid you suffered the humiliation of having to tuck bologna in your pjs at the supermarket, or of having to tell the waiter you are nine despite the hair above your lip, or of having to make up (with a humming black eye, of course) see-through tales for teachers, for classmates, of what your mom does or where you went on vacation, or of having to fill up two-liters inside fast-food restaurants (always making a mess, given the nerves electric through thin arms and the eyes shut to vanish, on the soda-fountain floor); if as a kid your people called you “pussy,” called you “faggot” and “bitch-ass nigga,” for reading or for finally getting glasses (after years pretending to see chalkboards) or for refusing to kidnap dogs to serve, through taped snouts, as fight practice for pit bulls, clubbed for every kindness— if any of these antecedents are true, how could there not be some je nais se quois about you, some offness that lingers no matter the decades of scrubbing: no matter the fixing of crooked teeth and the slang and the drag-step bop; no matter the participating in 5ks; no matter the inverse rows and face-pulls (exercises to reverse the depression hunch); no matter the abstinence from “Henrock”; no matter the classical art and music; no matter the self-hypnotizing denials of how good, of how home, it feels eating Vienna sausage from the can and hearing wet-hacking winos shriek (through their sunken pumpkin faces) bottle-smash curses into the night and seeing tit-flapping hood-rat fights (especially when at least one is pregnant and kicks are clearly gunning for the gut) and smelling stale cigarettes mixed with stale malt-liquor breath mixed with stale piss from unflushed toilets mixed with stale armpit sweat mixed with stale Raid and clutching the pen (ready to temple stab someone who might try to rob your jacket); no matter the tie (the bowtie) and the slacks; no matter the BA and even the PhD? However good you look on paper, how could your past (city, block) fail to radiate through how you enter and walk the room, through how you shake nonunderclass hands, through the cadence of your gait and voice, through your inflections and phrasings, through your very stance (perhaps torso turned away as if to guard your genitals), through how you sit (perhaps feet locked around the chair legs, hands rubbing the suprasternal notch, palms rarely shown)—or whatever the signals? However many “top-tier” publications, you would have to check every token box in vogue for these teary white “progressives,” the rape-eye-blocking scarf their metonym, to let you enter the academic tenure track— and at Wellesley, of all goddamn places! Just being black good enough now only in circles shrinking in size and number, how could it be tolerated in person (during an interview)—that creepy reek of squalor? The reek of you—diverse in spirit (a liability) and non-diverse on the surfaces that matter (non-flamboyant in wrist, non-wheelchaired, non-atrophied in muscle, non-dark in skin, non-troubled by birth sex, non-obese)— the reek of you is all-too-easy for the scarves, so gung ho in the war on safe-space threats that they banish even from course readings portrayals of hurt (rape, racism, self-harm), to misinterpret (some perhaps knowingly, seized by that chimp-reminiscent eroticism of gang-stomping those already beaten down) as the “problematic” reek of an “oppressor”?
*This poem is unpublished (and dear to me)
*Photo by Aly-Al