Discussion about this post

User's avatar
M. A. Istvan Jr.'s avatar

"As if Goethe Once Ate Up a Black Queen's Mic Time" is a sharply satirical and polemical poem that critiques contemporary intellectual and cultural trends, particularly the perceived anti-intellectualism and identity-driven rejections of canonical Western literature. The poem argues that the dismissal of "great literature" as "toxic" serves as a convenient "excuse" for a broader cultural illiteracy.

The title itself is a highly provocative and hyperbolic metaphor. It juxtaposes the revered German literary figure Goethe with "Black Queen's Mic Time," a phrase that immediately evokes modern cultural spaces, particularly those focused on marginalized voices and issues of representation and equity. The implied scenario—Goethe "eating up" mic time—satirizes the idea of historical Western figures somehow monopolizing contemporary discourse or overshadowing other narratives, even in an anachronistic and absurd way. This sets a tone of direct confrontation with current cultural debates.

The poem proceeds to characterize contemporary engagement with "great literature" as a form of "hashtag illiteracy". The simile "Champing on great literature / in our hashtag illiteracy / makes us look like orangutans / with Rubik’s cubes" is a central, derisive image. It suggests that modern individuals, due to their superficial engagement with knowledge ("hashtag illiteracy"), are incapable of comprehending complex intellectual works ("great literature"), making their attempts appear as futile and clumsy as an orangutan trying to solve a Rubik's Cube. This paints a bleak picture of intellectual decline.

The poem then introduces a small, beleaguered group: "for the few still fighting to crack / its necromantic nutrition." This phrase imbues "great literature" with a mystical, almost forbidden power ("necromantic nutrition"), suggesting it holds profound, life-giving sustenance that is difficult to access but vital. The reference to "the few still fighting" highlights the perceived marginalization of those who value this intellectual pursuit. The final lines deliver the poem's core satirical argument: "what better TikTok excuse / than to learn the broccoli— / dead, white, male—is toxic?" Here, the poem directly targets the reasons for this abandonment. "TikTok excuse" immediately points to a superficial, trend-driven form of justification. The metaphor of "the broccoli— / dead, white, male—is toxic" is a powerful and cynical summation of how canonical Western works are often categorized and dismissed in contemporary discourse. "Broccoli" implies something inherently good or nourishing but rejected for being unpalatable. The labels "dead, white, male" are presented as the convenient, pre-packaged reasons for deeming this literature "toxic," thus providing an "excuse" for intellectual disengagement rather than genuine effort to "crack its necromantic nutrition." The poem thus skewers what it views as a performative and ideologically driven rejection of the literary canon.

satire, literary criticism, cultural critique, identity politics, anti-intellectualism, literary canon, Western literature, cultural literacy, hashtag culture, TikTok, academic discourse, intellectual decline, performative activism, contemporary poetry.

Expand full comment

No posts